Health plan contract negotiations with an integrated delivery system (IDS) or a hospital are usually lengthier and more complex than negotiations with a single-specialty provider.
I think the key here is that case mix/severity adjustments allow for a more apples-to-apples comparison between providers. Option B captures that perfectly.
Haha, option D is a good one. Trying to compare outpatient and inpatient providers without adjusting for case mix is like trying to compare apples and oranges. Good luck with that!
Option C is interesting, but I don't think that's the right answer. If anything, these adjustments should help reduce the number of outliers by leveling the playing field.
I agree with Emilio. These adjustments are crucial to ensure we're not unfairly penalizing providers who happen to have more complex or high-risk patients.
Option B is the correct answer. Case mix/severity adjustments help account for differences in the patient populations that providers serve, which is important for fair performance measurement.
Carrol
9 months agoCandra
8 months agoCharlie
8 months agoLouann
8 months agoSalome
9 months agoMargarett
9 months agoGerman
10 months agoRolande
10 months agoJohnna
10 months agoChuck
9 months agoDeonna
9 months agoMonroe
9 months agoTelma
10 months agoVince
10 months agoAltha
10 months agoEmilio
10 months agoDaniel
9 months agoSueann
9 months agoNoah
9 months agoNatalya
9 months agoPedro
10 months agoRosenda
10 months ago