BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

AHIP Exam AHM-520 Topic 3 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for AHIP's AHM-520 exam
Question #: 99
Topic #: 3
[All AHM-520 Questions]

One way that a health plan can protect itself against case stripping is by requiring:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Madonna
28 days ago
Hmm, this question is like a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma. Time to put on my thinking cap and decode the case stripping conundrum!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nancey
29 days ago
B is too restrictive. A small group with no more than 10 members? That's just asking for trouble when it comes to risk pooling.
upvoted 0 times
Amira
3 days ago
I agree, B does seem too restrictive. C sounds like a better option to ensure proper risk pooling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
7 days ago
C) A minimum level of participation in order for a small group to be eligible for healthcare coverage
upvoted 0 times
...
Edda
10 days ago
A) Employees covered by a small group plan to contribute 100% of the cost of the healthcare coverage
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barbra
1 months ago
A is a bit extreme, don't you think? Requiring 100% employee contribution seems a bit overkill for protecting against case stripping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
1 months ago
D seems like the best option to me. The underwriter should focus on the employer's characteristics, not the individual group members.
upvoted 0 times
Lonny
5 days ago
It's important to strike a balance between the employer and group members when underwriting a small group plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
22 days ago
I see your point, but I still think option D is the most effective way to protect against case stripping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
23 days ago
I think focusing on the employer's characteristics can help prevent case stripping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
28 days ago
But wouldn't it be important to also consider the characteristics of the group members?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvis
29 days ago
I think option C is also important. Having a minimum level of participation can help prevent case stripping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
30 days ago
I agree, option D makes the most sense. It's important to look at the employer's characteristics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunny
1 months ago
I agree, option D seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenna
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think D) Its underwriters to consider the characteristics of the employer is also important to protect against case stripping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
2 months ago
I agree with Jani. Requiring a minimum level of participation makes sense to prevent case stripping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) A minimum level of participation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tina
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is C. Requiring a minimum level of participation ensures that the group is large enough to spread the risk and prevent case stripping.
upvoted 0 times
Peter
22 days ago
So, the key is to make sure there are enough members in the group to avoid case stripping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
24 days ago
It makes sense, spreading the risk among more members can help prevent case stripping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
29 days ago
I agree, having a minimum level of participation is important for the health plan to protect itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevieve
1 months ago
I think the correct answer is C. Requiring a minimum level of participation ensures that the group is large enough to spread the risk and prevent case stripping.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel