New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

AHIP Exam AHM-250 Topic 6 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for AHIP's AHM-250 exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 6
[All AHM-250 Questions]

The scandent Health Group contracted with the Empire Corporation to provide behavioral healthcare services to.

Empire employees. As a condition of providing behavioral healthcare services, scandent required Empire to contract with scandent for basic medical services scandent's actions constituted the type of antitrust violation known as a

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Vincent at Sep 10, 2024, 06:45 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AHM-250 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Jerrod
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is B) Price-fixing agreement because it involves setting prices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be C) Horizontal division of markets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malissa
3 months ago
Haha, I bet the Scandent executives came up with this scheme during their weekly game of 'Monopoly: Antitrust Edition'.
upvoted 0 times
Xochitl
2 months ago
C) Horizontal division of markets
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
2 months ago
B) Price-fixing agreement
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
2 months ago
A) Horizontal group boycott
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Omer
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's D) Tying arrangement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) Horizontal group boycott.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
3 months ago
Personally, I'm leaning towards C. Horizontal division of markets. Scandent is essentially carving out the Empire employee market for itself.
upvoted 0 times
Cherilyn
2 months ago
Interesting perspective. It's definitely a tricky situation. But I think it's B. Price-fixing agreement. Scandent is essentially fixing the prices for healthcare services by requiring Empire to contract with them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamie
2 months ago
I see where you're coming from. But I'm going with A. Horizontal group boycott. Scandent is essentially boycotting other competitors by requiring Empire to contract with them for services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
2 months ago
That's a good point. But I still think it's C. Horizontal division of markets. Scandent is essentially dividing the market for healthcare services among competitors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
2 months ago
I think it could also be D. Tying arrangement. Scandent is requiring Empire to contract with them for basic medical services as a condition of providing behavioral healthcare services.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Izetta
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Couldn't this also be considered a horizontal group boycott? Scandent is excluding other medical providers from serving Empire employees.
upvoted 0 times
Annamae
3 months ago
I see your point, but I think it's more about dividing the market horizontally rather than boycotting other providers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
3 months ago
C) Horizontal division of markets
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
3 months ago
I think you might be onto something there. Scandent's actions do seem to align with a horizontal group boycott.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
3 months ago
A) Horizontal group boycott
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leigha
4 months ago
I think the answer is D. Tying arrangement. Forcing Empire to use Scandent's medical services seems like a classic tying violation.
upvoted 0 times
Novella
3 months ago
I think it could also be a horizontal group boycott.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
3 months ago
I agree, it does seem like a tying arrangement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel