New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

AHIP Exam AHM-250 Topic 6 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for AHIP's AHM-250 exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 6
[All AHM-250 Questions]

The scandent Health Group contracted with the Empire Corporation to provide behavioral healthcare services to.

Empire employees. As a condition of providing behavioral healthcare services, scandent required Empire to contract with scandent for basic medical services scandent's actions constituted the type of antitrust violation known as a

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Lamar at Jun 01, 2024, 10:11 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AHM-250 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Tawanna
6 months ago
Ah, the joys of antitrust law. I'm going with B) Price-fixing agreement. Scandent is trying to control the market like a bunch of corporate overlords.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alverta
6 months ago
D) Tying arrangement, for sure. Scandent is trying to pull a fast one on Empire by forcing them to accept a whole package deal. Sneaky, sneaky!
upvoted 0 times
Brandon
6 months ago
D) Tying arrangement, for sure. Scandent is trying to pull a fast one on Empire by forcing them to accept a whole package deal. Sneaky, sneaky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
6 months ago
A) Horizontal group boycott
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keena
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. They all sound pretty bad to me. Maybe I should just ask the proctor for the answer, they'll probably give it to me if I bat my eyelashes.
upvoted 0 times
Ronald
6 months ago
B) Price-fixing agreement
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
6 months ago
I think it might be A) Horizontal group boycott.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
6 months ago
A) Horizontal group boycott
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorrine
7 months ago
This question is giving me a headache. I'm going to go with C) Horizontal division of markets. Scandent is trying to carve out a monopoly for themselves, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
7 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) Tying arrangement because scandent required Empire to contract with them for basic medical services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
7 months ago
B) Price-fixing agreement. Scandent is clearly trying to control the prices for medical services by bundling them with the behavioral healthcare contract.
upvoted 0 times
Fernanda
6 months ago
C) Horizontal division of markets
upvoted 0 times
...
German
6 months ago
B) Price-fixing agreement
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
7 months ago
A) Horizontal group boycott
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Frederic
7 months ago
I think the answer is A) Horizontal group boycott.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrinne
7 months ago
I think the answer is D) Tying arrangement. Forcing Empire to contract for basic medical services in order to get behavioral healthcare services seems like a classic tying arrangement to me.
upvoted 0 times
Francine
6 months ago
I think it's a horizontal division of markets, but I see your point about it being a tying arrangement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
6 months ago
I think it's a horizontal group boycott, actually.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
6 months ago
I agree, it does seem like a tying arrangement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
6 months ago
I think you're right, it definitely fits the description of a tying arrangement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
6 months ago
I agree, it does seem like a tying arrangement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
6 months ago
I agree, it does seem like a tying arrangement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel