A project manager wants to ensure that all documents within a certain project are shared with a designated team in Workfront What is the correct option for carrying out this action?
In Workfront, the best way to ensure that all documents within a project are shared with a designated team is to share the entire project. By sharing the project, all documents and related assets within that project are automatically made available to the designated team members according to the project's access permissions.
Option C is incorrect because sharing one document does not automatically inherit the same access levels for the other documents. Option A suggests linking documents from AEM, but the question pertains to sharing documents within Workfront itself.
Refer to Workfront's documentation on document sharing for detailed instructions on how to share all project-related assets with teams.
An AEM application must process a high volume of content ingestion on the author server
What Is a key factor to optimize a design for overall performance gain for implementing workflows?
When handling high-volume content ingestion in AEM, transient workflows are a key factor for optimizing performance. Transient workflows do not persist workflow data in the JCR repository, which greatly reduces the load on the repository and improves overall performance. Since content ingestion typically involves processing a large number of assets, using transient workflows prevents unnecessary data accumulation in the repository.
Transient workflows are ideal for operations where you don't need to keep historical data about each workflow instance, such as ingestion processes, thereby making the system faster and more efficient.
Option A (using schedulers) is not related to workflow performance, and Option B (allocating more RAM) is a generic solution but not directly tied to optimizing workflow efficiency.
For further guidance, refer to AEM's documentation on workflow optimization and transient workflows.
An AEM application requires a service user WRITE access to children nodes but not on the parent node itself. Which console should the developer use to apply appropriate ACL?
In AEM, when you need to manage access control (ACL) permissions, including setting specific permissions (like WRITE) for a service user on child nodes without affecting the parent node, the Permission Console is the appropriate tool.
The Permission Console allows you to set fine-grained permissions at both node and subnode levels, which is crucial for scenarios where access needs to be applied only to children nodes, not the parent node itself.
Option A (User Management Console) is used for managing user details, and Option C (Group Management Console) manages group settings, but neither of these are used for setting node-level permissions.
Refer to AEM's User and Group Access Management documentation for more information on using the Permission Console to manage ACLs effectively.
A user is reviewing a proof of a legal document that requires multiple approvals. There are several Images in the proof, all of which conform to the brand standards laid out by the organization. As the user works through the proof, the changes required all relate to written copy.
How should the user efficiently highlight and provide comments?
In this case, since the user is reviewing a legal document where all changes are related to written copy, the most efficient way to highlight and provide comments is by using the Text Select tool. This tool allows the user to select specific text in the document and attach comments directly related to the text, making it easier for others to understand the context of the feedback.
The Text Select tool is specifically designed for making text-based comments, which is ideal for written copy changes.
Options A (Freehand tool) and B (Box tool) are better suited for graphical annotations or drawing attention to areas of images, not text-specific feedback.
For more details, refer to Workfront Proofing documentation on proofing tools and their use cases.
A proof is configured with a mull) stage automated workflow the design team often has to edit these proofs before they are moved to legal and financial for review. Which proof permission role do the design team members need?
The Author permission role is necessary for the design team members who need to edit the proofs before they are sent for review by legal and financial teams. This role allows them to make changes directly to the proof and upload new versions, which is essential for their work in this multi-stage automated workflow.
Author role: Grants permission to edit and manage the proof, which includes uploading new versions and making changes to the existing proof content.
Options B (Reviewer) and C (Approver) are more restrictive roles that do not allow for editing proofs.
Refer to Workfront Proofing roles and permissions documentation for more information on the different proof roles.
Jolanda
7 days agoRaymon
19 days agoArt
23 days agoSabine
1 months agoHeike
2 months agoEdison
2 months agoHester
2 months agoMalcolm
2 months agoTasia
2 months agoMiss
3 months ago