A large enterprise purchased Adobe workfront during a 'Land & Expand' Workfront campaign The legal department saw the Workfront document approval functionality and felt it would be good for their department. They know that to be effective, they must be in the same instance as marketing.
The partner lead wants to collaborate with sales on how to approach this opportunity, when discussing with the marketing team, there was immediate pushback and the marketing manager refused to consider Workfront s group admin features.
Which first step would motivate marketing to endorse a single Workfront Instance across the enterprise?
To motivate Marketing to endorse a single Workfront instance across the enterprise, the best first step is to initiate Executive/Stakeholder Engagement. By getting senior leadership or key stakeholders from both the legal and marketing departments involved, it helps align the goals of the organization and illustrates the value of a unified system.
Executive engagement can help overcome resistance from individual departments (such as Marketing) by emphasizing the strategic importance of having a centralized system and showcasing the benefits for the entire organization.
Options A (training on group admin functions) and B (demo tailored for multiple groups) are useful but would not be as impactful as engaging executives to drive the initiative from the top down.
Refer to Workfront's adoption and implementation strategies for more information on how to engage stakeholders effectively.
A project manager wants to ensure that all documents within a certain project are shared with a designated team in Workfront What is the correct option for carrying out this action?
In Workfront, the best way to ensure that all documents within a project are shared with a designated team is to share the entire project. By sharing the project, all documents and related assets within that project are automatically made available to the designated team members according to the project's access permissions.
Option C is incorrect because sharing one document does not automatically inherit the same access levels for the other documents. Option A suggests linking documents from AEM, but the question pertains to sharing documents within Workfront itself.
Refer to Workfront's documentation on document sharing for detailed instructions on how to share all project-related assets with teams.
An AEM application must process a high volume of content ingestion on the author server
What Is a key factor to optimize a design for overall performance gain for implementing workflows?
When handling high-volume content ingestion in AEM, transient workflows are a key factor for optimizing performance. Transient workflows do not persist workflow data in the JCR repository, which greatly reduces the load on the repository and improves overall performance. Since content ingestion typically involves processing a large number of assets, using transient workflows prevents unnecessary data accumulation in the repository.
Transient workflows are ideal for operations where you don't need to keep historical data about each workflow instance, such as ingestion processes, thereby making the system faster and more efficient.
Option A (using schedulers) is not related to workflow performance, and Option B (allocating more RAM) is a generic solution but not directly tied to optimizing workflow efficiency.
For further guidance, refer to AEM's documentation on workflow optimization and transient workflows.
An AEM application requires a service user WRITE access to children nodes but not on the parent node itself. Which console should the developer use to apply appropriate ACL?
In AEM, when you need to manage access control (ACL) permissions, including setting specific permissions (like WRITE) for a service user on child nodes without affecting the parent node, the Permission Console is the appropriate tool.
The Permission Console allows you to set fine-grained permissions at both node and subnode levels, which is crucial for scenarios where access needs to be applied only to children nodes, not the parent node itself.
Option A (User Management Console) is used for managing user details, and Option C (Group Management Console) manages group settings, but neither of these are used for setting node-level permissions.
Refer to AEM's User and Group Access Management documentation for more information on using the Permission Console to manage ACLs effectively.
A user is reviewing a proof of a legal document that requires multiple approvals. There are several Images in the proof, all of which conform to the brand standards laid out by the organization. As the user works through the proof, the changes required all relate to written copy.
How should the user efficiently highlight and provide comments?
In this case, since the user is reviewing a legal document where all changes are related to written copy, the most efficient way to highlight and provide comments is by using the Text Select tool. This tool allows the user to select specific text in the document and attach comments directly related to the text, making it easier for others to understand the context of the feedback.
The Text Select tool is specifically designed for making text-based comments, which is ideal for written copy changes.
Options A (Freehand tool) and B (Box tool) are better suited for graphical annotations or drawing attention to areas of images, not text-specific feedback.
For more details, refer to Workfront Proofing documentation on proofing tools and their use cases.
Crissy
10 days agoBulah
19 days agoOllie
25 days agoJolanda
1 months agoRaymon
2 months agoArt
2 months agoSabine
2 months agoHeike
3 months agoEdison
3 months agoHester
3 months agoMalcolm
3 months agoTasia
3 months agoMiss
4 months ago