Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E908 Topic 4 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E908 exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 4
[All AD0-E908 Questions]

What is one of the primary benefits to setting up an automated proofing workflow instead of a basic workflow?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

One of the primary benefits of setting up an automated proofing workflow in Workfront, as opposed to a basic workflow, is the ability to create a series of review stages with dependencies between stages. This feature enhances the review process by:

Organizing Reviews: Multiple stages can be defined, ensuring that each stage is completed before the next begins, which helps maintain a structured and sequential review process.

Dependencies: Dependencies between stages ensure that proofs move through the review process in an orderly manner, with specific actions required at each stage.

Automation and Efficiency: Automating this process reduces the manual intervention needed, speeding up the overall proofing process and ensuring consistency across reviews.

This approach is highlighted in various user guides and advanced workflow setup training sessions for Workfront, emphasizing its efficiency and effectiveness in managing complex review processes.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Alecia
13 days ago
Option B all the way! Gotta love that automation magic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
15 days ago
I'm just here for the free donuts. Wait, what was the question again?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
17 days ago
Oh man, this is a tough one. I'm gonna have to go with C, though. Immediate access is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andrew
20 days ago
Hmm, I don't know. Granting read-only access sounds kind of limiting to me. I'd go with B.
upvoted 0 times
Bulah
15 days ago
I agree, having dependencies between stages can really streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leota
1 months ago
I prefer option B, where a series of review stages can be created with dependencies. It helps in maintaining a structured workflow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
1 months ago
I agree with Kathrine. It saves time and ensures timely feedback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladis
1 months ago
I'm all about that immediate access to the proof. C is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Linette
3 days ago
I love how convenient it is to have all reviewers access the proof immediately. C is definitely the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Destiny
11 days ago
It saves so much time when everyone can see the proof right from the start. C is the obvious answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
14 days ago
Having all required reviewers access the proof right away is so efficient. C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
18 days ago
No waiting around for the proof, just jump right in.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
21 days ago
Definitely, C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
21 days ago
I agree, immediate access is key. C is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
23 days ago
I agree, immediate access is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kathrine
1 months ago
I think one benefit is that all required reviewers can access the proof immediately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
2 months ago
Option B is the way to go! Automated workflows with review stages and dependencies are a game-changer.
upvoted 0 times
Dannie
22 days ago
Automated workflows make everything so much more efficient, especially when there are multiple reviewers involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
26 days ago
It definitely helps ensure that everything is reviewed in the correct order and nothing gets missed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
26 days ago
I agree, having review stages with dependencies really streamlines the proofing process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel