BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E903 Topic 1 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E903 exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 1
[All AD0-E903 Questions]

A marketing team determines that in the future, their projects must be reviewed by the Project Sponsor before the project is closed. What is the best practice to ensure that each project is properly reviewed and approved?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The best practice is to incorporate an approval process into the project template so that it is automatically triggered when a project reaches the completion stage. This ensures consistency and saves time by removing the need to manually set up approval processes for each new project. This approach also guarantees that the Project Sponsor's review is systematically included before the project is officially closed.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Elbert
1 months ago
I agree with Mila, option C makes more sense because it ensures consistency across all projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
1 months ago
Option C for the win! This way, we don't have to worry about setting up approval processes manually. It's all taken care of in the template.
upvoted 0 times
Brittni
12 days ago
Junita: Exactly, it's a proactive approach to project management that can help prevent any oversight or delays.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ngoc
21 days ago
It definitely streamlines the process and reduces the risk of projects being closed without proper review.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
23 days ago
I agree, having the approval process already set up in the project template saves time and ensures consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
25 days ago
Option C sounds like the most efficient way to ensure projects are properly reviewed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elina
1 months ago
Hmm, I think option A is the best choice here. A global setup ensures that all projects are properly reviewed, no exceptions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
2 months ago
I'd have to go with option B. Creating a single-use approval process on each project gives us more flexibility to handle specific requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Annmarie
25 days ago
Definitely, option B provides a more tailored approach to project approvals and ensures that each project is properly reviewed before closure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adela
28 days ago
I agree, having a single-use approval process on each project seems like the most efficient way to ensure proper review by the Project Sponsor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
1 months ago
Option B sounds like the best choice. It allows for more flexibility in handling different project requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Huey
2 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Setting up a default approval process in the project template ensures consistency across all Marketing projects.
upvoted 0 times
Kenny
19 days ago
Plus, it helps maintain accountability and transparency throughout the project lifecycle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
24 days ago
It definitely streamlines the approval process and ensures that nothing slips through the cracks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dwight
1 months ago
I agree, having a standard process in the project template will make it easier for the Project Sponsor to review and approve projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
1 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Setting up a default approval process in the project template ensures consistency across all Marketing projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Haydee
2 months ago
I think option A is the best practice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel