Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E902 Topic 2 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E902 exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 2
[All AD0-E902 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

In a scenario, there are two aggregators displaying different numbers in the bundle inspector: Aggregator 1 displays a 1, and Aggregator 2 displays a 10. What is a possible reason for this difference?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:

Understanding the Scenario:

The diagram shows two routes, each leading to an aggregator module (Aggregator 1 and Aggregator 2).

The bundle inspector indicates different output counts for the two aggregators: Aggregator 1 displays 1, and Aggregator 2 displays 10.

Option Analysis:

A . Aggregator 1's route is set to process the 1st bundle only, and Aggregator 2's route is set to process all bundles:

Incorrect. Aggregators process data from their input modules based on their configuration. While filters or limits might be applied earlier in the flow, the scenario does not suggest that the aggregator's configuration explicitly limits bundles in this way.

B . The source module for the aggregators are different:

Correct. The two aggregators receive input from different modules. For example, Aggregator 1 might aggregate bundles from 'Projects,' which outputs a single bundle, while Aggregator 2 aggregates bundles from 'Issues,' which outputs 10 bundles. This explains the differing numbers in the bundle inspector.

C . Aggregator 2 displays a 10 in the bundle inspector because it is set to repeat 10 times:

Incorrect. Aggregators do not 'repeat' a specific number of times. Instead, they process the input bundles passed to them and output a result based on the aggregation logic.

D . The scenario's router is set to only allow projects through the route to Aggregator 1 and only allows tasks through the route to Aggregator 2:

Incorrect. While the router might direct specific bundles (e.g., 'Projects' to Aggregator 1 and 'Issues' to Aggregator 2), the difference in bundle counts is determined by the source modules, not by the router's configuration alone.

Why Source Modules Determine Bundle Counts:

Each aggregator processes data from a source module. If the source module outputs different numbers of bundles, the aggregators will show different bundle counts.

In this example, 'Projects' might output only 1 bundle (e.g., 1 project), while 'Issues' outputs 10 bundles (e.g., 10 issues).

How to Verify:

Inspect the source modules feeding into each aggregator. Check the number of bundles they produce during the scenario run.

Confirm that the aggregators are aggregating based on their respective inputs.

Reference: This explanation aligns with Workfront Fusion's handling of bundles and aggregation logic. Differences in bundle counts at the aggregator level are typically due to differences in the source module outputs, as shown in the scenario.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Shelton
1 months ago
Hey, maybe Aggregator 2 is just feeling a little too repetitive today, you know? That's why it's displaying a 10 - it's like, 'I'm done with this, let's move on!'
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
1 months ago
I have a feeling the router is the culprit here. Option D sounds like it could be the reason for the difference in the displayed numbers. Gotta love those tricky scenario-based questions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
1 months ago
This is a tricky one. I wonder if the source module setting could be the issue, as mentioned in option B. Maybe the data is coming from different sources for the two aggregators.
upvoted 0 times
Sang
21 days ago
Aggregator 2 might be getting data from a different source module, causing it to display a 10.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
22 days ago
I think option B makes sense. The source module could be the reason for the different numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dino
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I'm leaning towards option A. It seems like the route settings for the aggregators are different, leading to the discrepancy in the displayed numbers.
upvoted 0 times
Elden
23 days ago
User 2: Agreed, it seems like the most logical explanation for the discrepancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
1 months ago
User 1: I think option A makes sense. The route settings could be the reason for the different numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leah
2 months ago
But wouldn't it make more sense for it to be B)?
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
2 months ago
Hmm, I think option C is the correct answer. Aggregator 2 is set to repeat 10 times, so it's displaying the total count of bundles processed.
upvoted 0 times
Hubert
25 days ago
Let's go with option C then, it seems to be the most likely reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
27 days ago
That's possible, but I still think option C makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
29 days ago
But what if Aggregator 2 is just processing bundles differently?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
1 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most logical explanation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arthur
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's C)
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
2 months ago
I think the answer is A)
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel