Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E720 Topic 3 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E720 exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 3
[All AD0-E720 Questions]

An Adobe Commerce developer was asked to customize a JavaScript component which is written as a function. How would the developer extend the native JavaScript function?

A)

B)

C)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To customize a JavaScript component that is written as a function, the developer can use option A. This option will use the prototype property of the function to extend its functionality and add new methods or properties. For example:

function Component() { // Component logic }

Component.prototype.customMethod = function() { // Custom method logic };

This will create a new method called customMethod on the prototype of the Component function, which can be accessed by any instance of the Component object. The developer can also override existing methods or properties on the prototype by reassigning them with new values.

Option B is not correct because it will not extend the native JavaScript function, but create a new function that wraps the original function. This will not allow the developer to access or modify the properties or methods of the original function. Option C is not correct because it will not extend the native JavaScript function, but create a new object that inherits from the original function. This will not allow the developer to customize the original function itself, but only its instances.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Leonor
1 days ago
I don't know, man. All these options look like they involve a lot of work. Can't we just throw some jQuery at the problem and call it a day?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alayna
2 days ago
Option C, all the way! Extending the function is the way to do it. Plus, it's the most elegant solution, like a fine wine paired with a well-crafted JavaScript component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
3 days ago
What makes you think Option C is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
9 days ago
I disagree, I believe Option C is the better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
14 days ago
Option A provides a clear and concise way to extend the native JavaScript function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
18 days ago
Why do you think Option A is the best choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
19 days ago
I think the developer should choose Option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Augustine
25 days ago
Hmm, Option A looks a bit too straightforward for my liking. Where's the challenge in that? I want something that really tests my JavaScript chops.
upvoted 0 times
Vincent
3 days ago
I think Option C would be the best choice for testing your JavaScript skills.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliann
3 days ago
I agree, Option A seems too easy. I prefer a challenge.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audria
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but Option B seems to have some fancy decorators going on. Gotta love those decorators, they add a touch of class to your code!
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
1 months ago
Option C looks like the way to go. Extending the native JavaScript function is the way to customize it, right?
upvoted 0 times
Clare
2 days ago
Definitely, extending the native JavaScript function with Option C is the way to go for customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
6 days ago
I agree, Option C is the best choice for customizing the JavaScript component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
15 days ago
https://www.practice4test.com/question_updater/json_images/AD0-E720/OtherImage_74b89fef1-e7b6-401b-aaa2-b46469868025.png
upvoted 0 times
...
Madonna
19 days ago
https://www.practice4test.com/question_updater/json_images/AD0-E720/OtherImage_74b89fef1-e7b6-401b-aaa2-b46469868025.png
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
30 days ago
Yes, you are correct. Extending the native JavaScript function allows you to customize it further.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel