Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E720 Topic 3 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E720 exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 3
[All AD0-E720 Questions]

An Adobe Commerce developer was asked to customize a JavaScript component which is written as a function. How would the developer extend the native JavaScript function?

A)

B)

C)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To customize a JavaScript component that is written as a function, the developer can use option A. This option will use the prototype property of the function to extend its functionality and add new methods or properties. For example:

function Component() { // Component logic }

Component.prototype.customMethod = function() { // Custom method logic };

This will create a new method called customMethod on the prototype of the Component function, which can be accessed by any instance of the Component object. The developer can also override existing methods or properties on the prototype by reassigning them with new values.

Option B is not correct because it will not extend the native JavaScript function, but create a new function that wraps the original function. This will not allow the developer to access or modify the properties or methods of the original function. Option C is not correct because it will not extend the native JavaScript function, but create a new object that inherits from the original function. This will not allow the developer to customize the original function itself, but only its instances.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Luke
15 days ago
Honestly, I'm just hoping the exam doesn't ask me to debug any spaghetti code. That's my worst nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
Rebbecca
2 days ago
I always get nervous when I see complex code to debug.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
4 days ago
I know right, debugging can be a nightmare sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shayne
18 days ago
Option B? More like Option 'B-A-D', am I right? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
Ryan
9 days ago
Haha, clever one! But let's stick to the correct option for the JavaScript customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
10 days ago
Yes, you're right! Option B does seem a bit 'bad'.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thaddeus
1 months ago
I'm torn, but I think I'll have to go with Option A. It's the classic approach, can't go wrong.
upvoted 0 times
Albina
6 days ago
I agree, Option A is the safe choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
7 days ago
Option C seems like the most efficient solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
11 days ago
I think Option B might offer more flexibility in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
23 days ago
I agree, Option A is the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorrie
1 months ago
Option C is the way to go. Gotta love that Object.create() action!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
1 months ago
Option B provides a more efficient way to extend the native JavaScript function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
1 months ago
I'm going with Option B. It just feels more elegant, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Lawrence
29 days ago
I think Option C might be a better fit for this particular customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Niesha
30 days ago
I agree, Option B does seem like the more elegant choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sage
1 months ago
Why do you think Option B is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe Option B is the better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
2 months ago
Option A looks straightforward, that's my pick.
upvoted 0 times
Judy
25 days ago
I think so too, let's go with Option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
1 months ago
I agree, Option A seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sage
2 months ago
I think the developer should choose Option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel