Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E720 Topic 1 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E720 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 1
[All AD0-E720 Questions]

An Adobe Commerce developer was asked to customize a JavaScript component which is written as a function. How would the developer extend the native JavaScript function?

A)

B)

C)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To customize a JavaScript component that is written as a function, the developer can use option A. This option will use the prototype property of the function to extend its functionality and add new methods or properties. For example:

function Component() { // Component logic }

Component.prototype.customMethod = function() { // Custom method logic };

This will create a new method called customMethod on the prototype of the Component function, which can be accessed by any instance of the Component object. The developer can also override existing methods or properties on the prototype by reassigning them with new values.

Option B is not correct because it will not extend the native JavaScript function, but create a new function that wraps the original function. This will not allow the developer to access or modify the properties or methods of the original function. Option C is not correct because it will not extend the native JavaScript function, but create a new object that inherits from the original function. This will not allow the developer to customize the original function itself, but only its instances.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Phillip
14 days ago
Wait, is this a trick question? What if the correct answer is actually 'D) Perform a ritual sacrifice to the JavaScript gods'? You never know with these exams...
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
19 days ago
Option B provides a more efficient way to extend the native JavaScript function, in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
23 days ago
Why do you think Option B is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe Option B would be a better choice for customizing the JavaScript component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
1 months ago
Option A? Really? That's just plain old function overriding. Where's the creativity, people? Option B is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
1 months ago
I'm going with Option C. Extending the constructor just seems like the right way to go here. Clean and straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Keva
11 days ago
Option C is definitely the clean and straightforward choice for extending native JavaScript functions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
15 days ago
I agree, extending the constructor is the way to go for customizing JavaScript functions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lauran
1 months ago
Option B looks the most intuitive for extending a JavaScript function. Gotta love those prototypes!
upvoted 0 times
Pansy
4 days ago
Prototypes can definitely help in extending native JavaScript functions efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
5 days ago
I agree, Option B seems like the most intuitive choice for developers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
9 days ago
Yeah, using prototypes is a great way to customize JavaScript components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorriane
19 days ago
I think Option B is the way to go for extending a JavaScript function.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Josefa
2 months ago
I think the developer should extend the native JavaScript function by using Option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel