Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E716 Topic 2 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E716 exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 2
[All AD0-E716 Questions]

Contribute your Thoughts:

Precious
2 months ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I bet the right answer is actually a secret combination of all three options. *winks*
upvoted 0 times
Hailey
1 days ago
User 2: No, I believe it's Option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
3 days ago
User 1: I think the answer is Option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sanda
2 months ago
Option C seems a bit too convoluted. I'd go with Option B - it's the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Keneth
14 days ago
Yeah, Option C does seem a bit complicated. Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christoper
18 days ago
I think Option A could work too, but Option B is simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sina
22 days ago
I agree, Option B is definitely the most straightforward choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Remedios
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to review the Magento DI documentation again to make sure I understand the proper syntax.
upvoted 0 times
Oliva
24 days ago
User 3: I believe they need to use the tag to pass the new instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
1 months ago
User 2: Yes, they can specify the dependency in the di.xml file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Inocencia
2 months ago
User 1: I think the developer can achieve this by using di.xml file.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melinda
3 months ago
I believe Option A is the correct way to achieve this based on the image provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
3 months ago
I agree, di.xml is the way to go for injecting dependencies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
3 months ago
Option B looks like the correct way to inject the Magento\\Filesystem\\Adapter\\Local instance into the Custom\\Module\\Model\\Example class.
upvoted 0 times
Dean
2 months ago
Let's go with Option B then, it seems like the most suitable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
2 months ago
I agree, Option B looks like the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
2 months ago
Yes, Option B seems to be the correct choice for injecting the instance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
2 months ago
I think Option B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Azzie
3 months ago
I think the developer should use di.xml to achieve this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derrick
3 months ago
I believe Option A is the correct way to achieve this based on the image provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
3 months ago
I agree, di.xml is the way to go for injecting dependencies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
3 months ago
I think the developer should use di.xml to achieve this.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel