You are reviewing a third party extension for Magento Commerce Cloud compatibility Which pattern makes a module incompatible with Magento Commerce Cloud?
This one seems pretty straightforward. I think the answer is D - direct instantiation of generated classes by the objectManager without the class being referenced in the constructor.
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm not familiar with the Wayback Machine, so I'll have to look into that option a bit more. Maybe I'll try a few different approaches and see what works best.
I'm going with C. Configuration referencing generated Proxy classes in the module's etc/frontend/di.xml file seems like the way to go for compatibility.
I'm not sure, but B seems like a reasonable answer. Direct instantiation by the objectManager in non-constructor methods with the class also being referenced in the constructor signature could be an issue.
I think the correct answer is D. Direct instantiation of generated classes by the objectManager without the class being referenced in the constructor is a pattern that makes a module incompatible with Magento Commerce Cloud.
Yes, you are correct! Direct instantiation of generated classes by the objectManager without the class being referenced in the constructor is a pattern that makes a module incompatible with Magento Commerce Cloud.
Mi
4 days agoGracia
5 days agoLavera
9 days agoLachelle
9 days agoHaydee
16 days agoDoretha
5 months agoKenneth
4 months agoLorrine
4 months agoReena
5 months agoIzetta
5 months agoThad
4 months agoSabrina
4 months agoWai
4 months agoHester
6 months agoArgelia
5 months agoMozell
5 months agoCarin
5 months agoAngelica
5 months agoEleonore
6 months agoAlyce
4 months agoNadine
4 months agoDesirae
4 months agoIraida
5 months agoKarl
6 months agoGiuseppe
6 months agoKarl
6 months ago