New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Adobe AD0-E559 Exam - Topic 4 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E559 exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 4
[All AD0-E559 Questions]

A marketer has run a whole email A/B test within an email program, and there was a clear winner defined when the test finished running. The marketer then wants to send a follow-up email to everyone who received the losing email.

How would they find the list of people who received the losing email?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Michael would monitor for the existence of programs in the Webinar channel that do not adhere to this new naming convention by creating a Program Performance report and filtering by Channel = Webinar. This report type shows metrics such as new names, success, cost per success, etc. for each program in a selected channel or folder. Michael can scan through the program names and identify any programs that do not start with 'WBN' as per his naming convention.Searching for 'WBN' in Marketing Activities or using Audit Trail will not help Michael find programs that do not follow his naming convention.


by Katina at Apr 14, 2024, 06:22 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E559 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Janae
3 months ago
B makes the most sense. No doubt about it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
3 months ago
Wait, is it really that easy? I had no idea!
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
3 months ago
A is just wrong. You can always track variants!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindy
4 months ago
I thought it was C? Seems more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonelle
4 months ago
Definitely B! That's how you track A/B test variants.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
4 months ago
I feel like option C could also be correct, but I need to double-check how the constraints are defined in the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought we could just use the email filter instead of the A/B test one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think using the A/B Test filter is the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
5 months ago
I think the answer might be B, but I'm not entirely sure how the filters work in the email program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. It's option B - using the "Was Sent A/B Test" filter with a Variant constraint to identify the recipients of the losing email.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michel
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The "Was Sent A/B Test" filter with a Variant constraint should let me see who received the losing email. That seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I'm not sure how to find the list of people who received the losing email. The options don't seem super clear to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward A/B test question. I think the key is figuring out how to identify the recipients of the losing variant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know equitable relief involves non-monetary remedies, but I'm not totally clear on how that applies here. I'll have to think it through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
5 months ago
This is a classic cost behavior question. I remember learning that as revenue increases, variable costs rise and consume a higher percentage of that revenue, so I'll go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. PE1 pushes three labels, ASBR1 pops the LDP label, ASBR2 swaps the BGP label and pushes an LDP label, and PE2 pops all labels. I think I've got a good handle on this now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question. I think modifying the flow to update the To field with the new sales manager's email would be the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
9 months ago
Option B is the way to go, no doubt about it. Though I do wonder if the marketers out there are using the 'Was Sent A/B Test' filter to track their ex-partners' email activity. You know, just to, uh, 'test' things. Wink, wink.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
9 months ago
I bet the person who wrote option A has never actually run an A/B test before. It's like saying 'You can't see the results of your experiment' - that's just nonsense.
upvoted 0 times
Iesha
8 months ago
Let's make sure to use the right filter to target the right audience for the follow-up email.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
8 months ago
Using the Was Sent A/B Test filter with a Variant constraint is the most efficient method for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
9 months ago
I agree, option B is the correct way to find the list of people who received the losing email.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
9 months ago
Option A is definitely not the way to go. It's important to be able to track who received which email.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Moon
9 months ago
Option A is just wrong. Of course you can see who got the losing email! How else would you know it was the losing variant? That's like saying you can't see the results of an A/B test, which is kind of the whole point.
upvoted 0 times
Werner
8 months ago
Exactly, you can use the filter to find the list of people who received the losing email.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
8 months ago
Use the Was Sent A/B Test filter with a Variant constraint
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
9 months ago
Option A is just wrong. Of course you can see who got the losing email! How else would you know it was the losing variant?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shalon
10 months ago
I'm not sure if option C is gonna work. The Was Sent Email filter might not give you the specific test variant information you need. Better stick with option B and the A/B Test filter.
upvoted 0 times
Tracie
9 months ago
Definitely, sticking with option B and the A/B Test filter is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
9 months ago
I agree, option C might not give the specific test variant information needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
9 months ago
Option B is the way to go. Use the Was Sent A/B Test filter with a Variant constraint.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Louisa
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C) could also work. It's worth considering both options before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eloisa
11 months ago
Option B seems like the way to go. I mean, it's an A/B test, so there has to be a way to see who got which variant, right? The Was Sent A/B Test filter sounds perfect for this.
upvoted 0 times
Royal
9 months ago
Definitely. It's a good practice to analyze the results of A/B tests and take appropriate actions based on the outcomes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
10 months ago
That makes sense. It's important to follow up with those who received the losing email to ensure a consistent customer experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
10 months ago
Yes, you're right. Using the Was Sent A/B Test filter with a Variant constraint will help identify the list of people who received the losing email.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
10 months ago
Yes, you're right. Using the Was Sent A/B Test filter with a Variant constraint will help identify the list of people who received the losing email.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
10 months ago
Option B seems like the way to go. I mean, it's an A/B test, so there has to be a way to see who got which variant, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Martin
10 months ago
Option B seems like the way to go. I mean, it's an A/B test, so there has to be a way to see who got which variant, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Myra
11 months ago
I agree with Lou, that seems like the most logical way to find the list of people who received the losing email.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
11 months ago
I think the answer is B) Use the Was Sent A/B Test filter with a Variant constraint.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel