BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E213 Topic 3 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E213 exam
Question #: 43
Topic #: 3
[All AD0-E213 Questions]

Contribute your Thoughts:

Marisha
4 months ago
I see where you're coming from, Lavelle, but I still think it's C) An object was expected but was not provided because the error is about the absence of an object.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
4 months ago
Haha, classic JavaScript exception. I remember the first time I encountered this - I thought my code was possessed or something. But yeah, C is definitely the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Lindsey
3 months ago
Yeah, definitely. It's important to understand what each one means to debug effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
3 months ago
I know right, JavaScript exceptions can be so confusing sometimes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavelle
4 months ago
I believe the correct answer is A) An object was defined as 'non-null' but the code attempted to set it to null.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
4 months ago
I agree with Dorsey, because the error message clearly states that 'x is not a non-null object'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorsey
4 months ago
I think the answer is C) An object was expected but was not provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
4 months ago
Wait, I thought it was B. If an object was expected to be non-null, but it was null, that would throw this error, right? Or am I missing something?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
4 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I bet it's C - an object was expected but not provided. That's usually the case when you get this kind of error.
upvoted 0 times
Dahlia
3 months ago
I agree with you, it does sound like that could be the cause of the error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
3 months ago
I think it's A - an object was defined as 'non-null' but the code attempted to set it to null.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel