Adobe AD0-E207 Exam - Topic 2 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for Adobe's AD0-E207 exam

Question #: 2
Topic #: 2

A coworker creates the calculated metric named "Orders / Visits" in Adobe Analytics to determine the percentage of visits that purchased something on the company's website.

The coworker includes the calculated metric in the Products report. The coworker notices that the sum of the orders for the products is greater than the total orders shown in the report.

What should the Architect do?

ACreate a new classification and upload the SAINT file

BCreate a Data Source to upload the totals

CPut the Orders and Visits into a new event using Processing Rules

DCreate a calculated metric that includes Total versions of the metrics

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

The issue arises because the calculated metric 'Orders / Visits' is not aggregating correctly at the product level in the Products report. To resolve this, the Architect should create a calculated metric that uses the Total versions of the Orders and Visits metrics. This ensures that the calculation is performed on the overall totals rather than individual line items, providing an accurate percentage of visits that resulted in purchases.

by Iraida at Jul 08, 2024, 04:28 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AD0-E207 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Bettina

3 months ago

I agree, D is the way to go for accurate calculations!

upvoted 0 times

...

Flo

3 months ago

Definitely not A, that won't solve the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Han

3 months ago

Wait, how can the product orders be higher than total orders? That seems off!

upvoted 0 times

...

Doug

4 months ago

I think option D makes the most sense here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ettie

4 months ago

Sounds like a classic case of metric misalignment!

upvoted 0 times

...

Noel

4 months ago

I think using Processing Rules to create a new event could be a solution, but I'm not confident if that's the best approach here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

4 months ago

I feel like we had a similar scenario in our last session, but I can't recall if it was about classifications or data sources. This is tricky!

upvoted 0 times

...

Nicolette

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think creating a new calculated metric with total versions might help clarify the numbers. It sounds familiar from our practice questions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mauricio

5 months ago

I remember we discussed how calculated metrics can sometimes lead to discrepancies if they're not set up correctly. This seems like one of those cases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lilli

5 months ago

This is a good one. I'm pretty confident that option D is the right answer. Calculating the totals directly should give us the accurate picture we need.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alton

5 months ago

I think option D is the way to go here. Creating a calculated metric with the Total versions of the orders and visits metrics should help reconcile the discrepancy. It's a straightforward solution that should address the problem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alaine

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused on this one. The options all seem plausible, but I'm not sure which one is the best approach. Maybe I should review the question again more closely.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deeanna

5 months ago

Okay, let's see. The key issue here is that the sum of the orders for the products is greater than the total orders. I'm leaning towards option D, creating a calculated metric that includes the Total versions of the metrics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jutta

5 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mable

5 months ago

Okay, I've got this. Payment method, transfer of ownership, and risk transfer are definitely implied terms. I'll double-check the others to make sure I have the right 3.

upvoted 0 times

...

Onita

5 months ago

I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. The find command is a big no-no for dom0 memory, and you generally don't want to add more memory to dom0 when increasing the VM load. The key is to avoid double buffering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilburn

2 years ago

I believe putting Orders and Visits into a new event using Processing Rules could also work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quinn

2 years ago

I agree with Margot, creating a Data Source seems like the best solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blossom

2 years ago

Ah, the joys of Adobe Analytics! I bet the coworker forgot to carry the one or something. D is the way to go, for sure.

upvoted 0 times

Karina

2 years ago

Definitely. It's crucial to have accurate data for analysis and decision-making.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sol

2 years ago

Yeah, I agree. It's important to make sure all the data is accounted for in the calculated metric.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodney

2 years ago

I think D is the best option here. Including the Total versions of the metrics should solve the discrepancy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristy

2 years ago

Definitely, that should help reconcile the sum of orders with the total orders shown in the report.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ula

2 years ago

Yeah, creating a calculated metric that includes the Total versions of the metrics should fix the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherelle

2 years ago

I think D is the best option here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margot

2 years ago

I think the Architect should create a Data Source to upload the totals.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elsa

2 years ago

Okay, this is a head-scratcher. I'm gonna go with D and hope the Architect can work their magic to untangle this mess.

upvoted 0 times

Rhea

2 years ago

Yeah, let's trust the Architect to fix this with a calculated metric that covers all the bases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jin

2 years ago

I think D is the way to go, including the Total versions might solve the discrepancy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jenise

2 years ago

Woah, the sum of orders is greater than the total orders? That's gotta be a glitch in the system. I'd go with D to get the accurate totals.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tonette

2 years ago

Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I think the calculated metric is messing up the data, so D seems like the best option to fix it.

upvoted 0 times

Tori

2 years ago

I think either D or A could work, but D might be more comprehensive in addressing the problem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gilbert

2 years ago

That's a good point, it could potentially solve the discrepancy in the data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felicitas

2 years ago

But wouldn't creating a new classification and uploading the SAINT file also help in fixing the issue?

upvoted 0 times

...

Audrie

2 years ago

That sounds like a good solution. It should provide a more accurate representation of the data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sage

2 years ago

I agree, D seems like the best option to include the Total versions of the metrics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamar

2 years ago

I agree, creating a calculated metric that includes Total versions of the metrics should help reconcile the discrepancy.

upvoted 0 times

...