BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Adobe Exam AD0-E134 Topic 3 Question 18 Discussion

Contribute your Thoughts:

Johnna
4 months ago
Interesting perspective, Hester. It's helpful to consider all aspects of the tool's scope while preparing for the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hester
5 months ago
I personally believe that option C is out of scope. Definitions of Oak indices for compatibility don't seem relevant to the Pattern Detector tool during an AEM upgrade.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
5 months ago
That's a good point, Laila. rep:User nodes compatibility might be out of scope for the tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laila
5 months ago
For me, it's option D. rep:User nodes compatibility in the context of OAuth configuration seems irrelevant to the Pattern Detector tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
5 months ago
I agree with Fernanda, option B. Backward compatibility with the previous version should not be considered while using the Pattern Detector tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
6 months ago
I think Out of Scope for the Pattern Detector tool during an AEM upgrade is backward compatibility with the previous version.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
6 months ago
I agree with Aileen. rep:User nodes compatibility is not within the scope of the Pattern Detector tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
6 months ago
I believe option D is the correct answer. OAuth configuration compatibility is not relevant for the tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
6 months ago
I disagree with Cristal. Backward compatibility is crucial for seamless transition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
6 months ago
I think option B is out of scope. Backward compatibility shouldn't be a concern during an upgrade.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel