New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Acquia Exam Acquia-Certified-Site-Builder-D8 Topic 4 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Acquia's Acquia-Certified-Site-Builder-D8 exam
Question #: 82
Topic #: 4
[All Acquia-Certified-Site-Builder-D8 Questions]

You've been asked to add several new fields and a view for the news area of a site with a very busy comments section The QA team wants to review your work in staging before rolling everything out to production all at once.

How can you meet these requirements without interfering with the production site's comment activity or having to create the new functionality independently in both environments?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Glynda
21 hours ago
C is just wrong. Configuration changes don't magically sync across environments just because they share a database. That's not how it works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
5 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about B. Exporting the config into the existing codebase could be risky if there are any conflicts. A seems cleaner to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
5 days ago
I agree with Vivan. Option A ensures that we can make changes without affecting the live site.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
6 days ago
I think option A is the best approach. It allows us to develop and test in a separate environment before pushing to production.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamonica
13 days ago
Option A seems like the way to go here. Exporting the configuration to code and pushing it to staging for QA review is the safest approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel