BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ACFE Exam CFE-Law Topic 4 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE-Law exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 4
[All CFE-Law Questions]

Grant, a fraud examiner is investigating Beatrice for embezzlement on his employer's behalf. During his investigation. Grant learns that Beatrice has cheated on her spouse and he tells several of Beatrice's coworkers about it Beatrice discovers that Grant revealed the unflattering (albeit true) information about her and decides to file a claim of defamation against Grant. Which of the following is the BEST of why Beatrice will not win her defamation case?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Nickolas at Sep 15, 2024, 09:19 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CFE-Law Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Gary
1 months ago
But what about the privilege communication to coworkers? Could that also be a strong reason why Beatrice may not win?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
2 months ago
I agree with Salena, if the information was true, Beatrice may not win her defamation case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
2 months ago
I bet Beatrice is regretting that affair now. Maybe she should have thought about the consequences before stepping out on her spouse.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
2 months ago
I think the best reason is that the information was true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
2 months ago
The best answer is definitely A. If the information is true, it's not defamation, no matter how juicy the details are.
upvoted 0 times
Kiera
22 days ago
D) The statement was not printed and distributed
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
1 months ago
B) The communications to the subject's coworkers were privileged
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
1 months ago
A) The information was true
upvoted 0 times
...
William
1 months ago
A) The information was true
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Junita
2 months ago
Wow, Beatrice is really reaching here! Defamation for telling the truth? That's a stretch even for a fraud examiner like Grant.
upvoted 0 times
Rupert
1 months ago
B) The communications to the subject's coworkers were privileged
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
2 months ago
A) The information was true
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel