I heard a joke the other day about a guy who tried to get some nonpublic records from the government. Turns out they were so nonpublic, they didn't even exist! Haha, classic government red tape.
C) In most jurisdictions, banks are allowed to turn over a suspect's account information directly to a fraud victim when there is adequate evidence of wrongdoing.
Option B sounds like a real bummer for civil cases. How are you supposed to get justice if you can't even see the evidence? That's like playing a game with one hand tied behind your back.
Option A sounds like a big ol' loophole to me. Once a case is filed, the public gets to see everything? I don't think so, that's just asking for trouble.
I'm gonna have to go with option D on this one. From what I know, the government tends to be pretty tight-lipped when it comes to sharing nonpublic records, even with the victims of the crime. Gotta protect that classified information, you know?
Option C seems like a pretty convenient way for fraud victims to get the information they need. But I wonder if that's really the case in most jurisdictions - banks are usually pretty protective of their customers' privacy.
Shawna
2 months agoBrandon
2 months agoShawna
2 months agoJohana
2 months agoYvette
1 months agoFrancoise
1 months agoShenika
1 months agoCandra
2 months agoTijuana
2 months agoRonny
2 months agoNaomi
20 days agoLoreta
1 months agoCelia
1 months agoProvidencia
2 months agoShawnda
2 months agoFranchesca
2 months agoCharlette
2 months ago