BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ACFE Exam CFE-Investigation Topic 2 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for ACFE's CFE-Investigation exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 2
[All CFE-Investigation Questions]

Beta, a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE). is conducting an admission-seeking interview of Gamma, a fraud suspect. After Beta gave Gamma an appropriate rationalization for his conduct, Gamma continued his denials, giving various alibis. These alibis can usually be diffused by all of the following techniques EXCEPT:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Trevor
4 months ago
I agree with Janessa, discussing Gamma's prior deceptions can undermine his credibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
4 months ago
I think the answer is C because discussing prior deceptions can help diffuse alibis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerrie
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
4 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
4 months ago
You know, I heard Gamma's favorite hobby is 'Escape Artist: Professional Edition.' Dude's got more alibis than a politician has broken promises.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
4 months ago
Displaying physical evidence? That's like trying to catch a greased pig. Gamma's probably got a hidden compartment in his underwear for all the evidence.
upvoted 0 times
Helga
4 months ago
Gamma: I have a solid alibi, it wasn't me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Percy
4 months ago
Beta: Let's discuss the testimony of witnesses.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dorcas
4 months ago
I'm going with C. Discussing Gamma's prior deceptions. That's like bringing a bazooka to a knife fight. Gamma's gonna have a hard time talking his way out of that one.
upvoted 0 times
Natalya
3 months ago
True, it definitely puts Gamma in a tough spot. Beta is really using all the tools in the toolbox to get to the truth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
3 months ago
Yeah, discussing Gamma's prior deceptions seems like a strong tactic. It's hard to argue against your own history.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
3 months ago
D) Downplaying the strength of the evidence
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyda
3 months ago
B) Displaying physical evidence
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
3 months ago
A) Discussing the testimony of witnesses
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
4 months ago
Gamma: I have an alibi for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
4 months ago
Beta: Let's talk about the testimony of witnesses.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denny
5 months ago
Downplaying the strength of the evidence? Hah! Good luck with that. Beta's gonna need some serious sleight of hand to make that one work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamika
5 months ago
Discussing the testimony of witnesses? That's like trying to argue with a brick wall. Gamma's got a whole arsenal of alibis ready to go!
upvoted 0 times
Penney
4 months ago
Gamma: I have a solid alibi for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
4 months ago
Beta: Let's talk about the testimony of witnesses.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel