I'm going with D. Professional skepticism is the foundation of a thorough fraud examination, and it should only be relaxed when the evidence clearly indicates no fraud has occurred.
A is a bit too extreme. Fraud examiners should maintain skepticism, but they should also be open to evidence that may disprove their initial suspicions.
I believe that maintaining a mindset that no fraud has occurred goes against the purpose of a fraud examination. So, I think the answer is D) Professional skepticism can be dispelled only by evidence.
I think the correct answer is D. Professional skepticism should not be easily dispelled, but rather maintained throughout the examination process until sufficient evidence is gathered.
Altha
2 months agoStevie
22 days agoMargurite
1 months agoAnissa
2 months agoDewitt
2 months agoArthur
2 months agoIesha
2 months agoOmega
2 months agoJacki
3 months agoCaitlin
3 months agoRoxanne
2 months agoWilletta
2 months agoJeannetta
2 months agoToi
3 months agoLavonna
3 months agoYong
3 months agoSanjuana
3 months agoJade
2 months agoSena
2 months agoMoira
2 months agoJacki
2 months agoAnthony
2 months agoDevora
3 months agoEden
3 months agoAnnita
3 months ago