I'm going with D. Professional skepticism is the foundation of a thorough fraud examination, and it should only be relaxed when the evidence clearly indicates no fraud has occurred.
A is a bit too extreme. Fraud examiners should maintain skepticism, but they should also be open to evidence that may disprove their initial suspicions.
I believe that maintaining a mindset that no fraud has occurred goes against the purpose of a fraud examination. So, I think the answer is D) Professional skepticism can be dispelled only by evidence.
I think the correct answer is D. Professional skepticism should not be easily dispelled, but rather maintained throughout the examination process until sufficient evidence is gathered.
Altha
4 months agoStevie
3 months agoMargurite
3 months agoAnissa
4 months agoDewitt
4 months agoArthur
4 months agoIesha
4 months agoOmega
4 months agoJacki
5 months agoCaitlin
5 months agoRoxanne
4 months agoWilletta
4 months agoJeannetta
4 months agoToi
5 months agoLavonna
5 months agoYong
5 months agoSanjuana
5 months agoJade
4 months agoSena
4 months agoMoira
4 months agoJacki
4 months agoAnthony
4 months agoDevora
5 months agoEden
5 months agoAnnita
5 months ago