Free Preparation Discussions
MENU
Acams Exam CAMS-FCI Topic 4 Question 6 Discussion
Topic #: 4
An investigator receives an alert documenting a series of transactions. A limited liability corporation (LLC) wired 59.000,000 USD to an overseas account associated with a state-run oil company. A second account associated with the state-run oil company wired 600,000,000 USD to the LLC. The LLC then wired money to other accounts, a money brokerage firm, and real estate purchases.
The investigator initiated an enhanced KYC investigation on the LLC. The financial institution opened the LLC account a couple of weeks prior to the series of transactions. The names associated with the LLC had changed multiple times since the account opened. A search of those names revealed relations with multiple LLCs. Public records about the LLCs did not show any identifiable business activities.
Open-source research identified mixed reports about the brokerage firm. The firm indicated it purchased mutual funds for its clients and dispensed returns to clients.
Media reports claimed the firm laundered money by holding for a fee before returning it to investors.
The investigator discovers that the bank has no records pertaining to ownership of the LLC. What would this mean for the bank and/or investigator?
The bank is out of compliance with CIP regulations because it did not obtain the minimum identifying information from the customer prior to opening the account, as required by 31 CFR 1020.220(a)(2)(i)(A). The bank should have obtained the name, date of birth, address, and identification number of the customer, as well as verified the identity of the customer to the extent reasonable and practicable. The lack of ownership data may also indicate a violation of beneficial ownership regulations, but that is not the primary issue in this case.
Darell
2 days agoKayleigh
19 days agoHalina
20 days agoShantell
26 days agoTula
28 days agoBobbye
8 days agoMitzie
30 days agoOwen
9 days agoBarrett
11 days agoAlva
12 days agoTori
1 months ago