Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

AAFM GLO_CWM_LVL_1 Exam - Topic 4 Question 95 Discussion

Given the following information:What is the expected return and standard deviation of the portfolio if 50% of funds invested in each stock? What would be the impact if the correlation coefficient were 0.6 instead of 0.2?
C) 16%, 0.314, 0.273
A) 18%, 0.456, 0.312
B) 16%, 0.398, 0.296
D) 19%, 0.429, 0.316

AAFM GLO_CWM_LVL_1 Exam - Topic 4 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for AAFM's GLO_CWM_LVL_1 exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 4
[All GLO_CWM_LVL_1 Questions]

Given the following information:

What is the expected return and standard deviation of the portfolio if 50% of funds invested in each stock? What would be the impact if the correlation coefficient were 0.6 instead of 0.2?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Jodi at Nov 16, 2024, 09:50 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium GLO_CWM_LVL_1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Stevie
9 months ago
The expected return seems reasonable, but those deviations are tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
9 months ago
I disagree, I feel like the correlation change would really affect the outcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
9 months ago
Surprised by how low the standard deviation can go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
10 months ago
I think option D might be too optimistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
10 months ago
Looks like option B is the most balanced choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
10 months ago
I’m leaning towards option B, but I can't shake the feeling that I might have mixed up the correlation effects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
10 months ago
I think the expected return should be around 16%, but I’m not confident about the standard deviation. The correlation change might really affect it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
10 months ago
This question feels familiar; I think we did a similar one where we had to adjust for correlation. I hope I remember the right steps!
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
11 months ago
I remember we practiced calculating expected returns, but I'm unsure about the exact formulas for standard deviation in a portfolio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josue
11 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The key is to apply the right portfolio theory equations and pay attention to the correlation coefficient change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. I'll plug the numbers into the portfolio optimization formulas and see which answer choice matches my calculations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the correlation coefficient part. How does that impact the portfolio metrics? I'll need to review that concept.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
11 months ago
This looks like a standard portfolio optimization problem. I'll need to calculate the expected return and standard deviation based on the given information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherly
2 years ago
Forget the numbers, I'm just here for the portfolio memes. 'How to turn your investment into a complete nightmare in 3 easy steps.'
upvoted 0 times
Hana
2 years ago
User 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
2 years ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
2 years ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kayleigh
2 years ago
Wait, did they just ask us to calculate the impact of correlation on a portfolio? Sounds like someone's been watching too many finance documentaries on Netflix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
2 years ago
But what about the impact of the correlation coefficient? Would it really make a big difference?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
2 years ago
I agree with Adrianna, option B seems to be the most reasonable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
2 years ago
High risk, high reward! 19% return and 0.429 standard deviation? Sign me up, I'm feeling lucky today!
upvoted 0 times
Gerald
2 years ago
It's all about finding the right balance between risk and reward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
2 years ago
I prefer a more conservative approach, maybe option C would be better for me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
2 years ago
I think I'll go with option D, 19% return sounds tempting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
2 years ago
That's a bold move, high risk indeed!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adrianna
2 years ago
I think the expected return would be 16% with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
2 years ago
Ah, the sweet spot! 16% return and 0.314 standard deviation. Now that's what I call a well-balanced portfolio.
upvoted 0 times
Nadine
2 years ago
Azzie: I wonder how the numbers would change if the correlation coefficient was 0.6 instead of 0.2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azzie
2 years ago
User 2: Definitely, it's the sweet spot for a well-balanced portfolio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
2 years ago
User 1: I agree, a 16% return and 0.314 standard deviation is ideal.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Michael
2 years ago
I'm more of a conservative investor, so I'd go with option B - 16% return and 0.398 standard deviation. Seems like a safer bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheline
2 years ago
Hmm, let's see... 18% return and 0.456 standard deviation? Sounds like a pretty risky investment to me.
upvoted 0 times
Glenn
2 years ago
That would definitely impact the risk and return of the portfolio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
2 years ago
But what if the correlation coefficient was 0.6 instead of 0.2?
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
2 years ago
I think option D looks more appealing with a 19% return.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latricia
2 years ago
I agree, that does seem like a high standard deviation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel