Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

AAFM Exam GLO_CWM_LVL_1 Topic 4 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for AAFM's GLO_CWM_LVL_1 exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 4
[All GLO_CWM_LVL_1 Questions]

Given the following information:

What is the expected return and standard deviation of the portfolio if 50% of funds invested in each stock? What would be the impact if the correlation coefficient were 0.6 instead of 0.2?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Jodi at Nov 16, 2024, 09:50 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium GLO_CWM_LVL_1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Sherly
2 months ago
Forget the numbers, I'm just here for the portfolio memes. 'How to turn your investment into a complete nightmare in 3 easy steps.'
upvoted 0 times
Hana
2 months ago
User 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
2 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
2 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kayleigh
3 months ago
Wait, did they just ask us to calculate the impact of correlation on a portfolio? Sounds like someone's been watching too many finance documentaries on Netflix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
3 months ago
But what about the impact of the correlation coefficient? Would it really make a big difference?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
3 months ago
I agree with Adrianna, option B seems to be the most reasonable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
3 months ago
High risk, high reward! 19% return and 0.429 standard deviation? Sign me up, I'm feeling lucky today!
upvoted 0 times
Gerald
1 months ago
It's all about finding the right balance between risk and reward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
1 months ago
I prefer a more conservative approach, maybe option C would be better for me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
1 months ago
I think I'll go with option D, 19% return sounds tempting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
2 months ago
That's a bold move, high risk indeed!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adrianna
3 months ago
I think the expected return would be 16% with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
3 months ago
Ah, the sweet spot! 16% return and 0.314 standard deviation. Now that's what I call a well-balanced portfolio.
upvoted 0 times
Nadine
2 months ago
Azzie: I wonder how the numbers would change if the correlation coefficient was 0.6 instead of 0.2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azzie
3 months ago
User 2: Definitely, it's the sweet spot for a well-balanced portfolio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
3 months ago
User 1: I agree, a 16% return and 0.314 standard deviation is ideal.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Michael
3 months ago
I'm more of a conservative investor, so I'd go with option B - 16% return and 0.398 standard deviation. Seems like a safer bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheline
3 months ago
Hmm, let's see... 18% return and 0.456 standard deviation? Sounds like a pretty risky investment to me.
upvoted 0 times
Glenn
2 months ago
That would definitely impact the risk and return of the portfolio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
2 months ago
But what if the correlation coefficient was 0.6 instead of 0.2?
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
2 months ago
I think option D looks more appealing with a 19% return.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latricia
3 months ago
I agree, that does seem like a high standard deviation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel